Abstract
Background: Skin prick test is the most widely used test for the diagnosis of IgE-mediated conditions. Commercial extracts are used for its performance, but in the case of fruits and vegetables it is preferable using fresh food. Although both tests possess a good safety profile, hypersensitivity reactions have been recorded.
Clinical case: Forty-seven-year old woman with a history of persistent allergic rhinitis, sensitized to the pollen of grasses, olive and salsola; she was referred to an allergology department due to anaphylaxis triggered by the consumption of avocado, cantaloupe, carrots and watermelon. Minutes after skin prick test with standardized extract and skin prick with fresh foods, she developed dyspnea, pruritus, erythema, dizziness and sibilance; she was administered 0.5 mg of intramuscular adrenalin and 4 salbutamol inhalations and placed in the Trendelemburg position. Dyspnea persisted, and vital signs monitoring showed heart and respiratory rates increase and, hence, salbutamol was applied again, together with 2 L/min of oxygen delivered by nasal cannula, intravenous fluids and 100 mg intravenous hydrocortisone; improvement was observed at 40 minutes. The patient was hospitalized for 48 hours.
Conclusions: Although skin tests are safe, the risk of hypersensitivity and anaphylactic reactions should not be ruled out, especially in susceptible patients.
References
Pitsios C, Dimitriou A, Stefanaki EC, Kontou-Fili K. Anaphylaxis during skin testing with food allergens in children. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(5):613-615. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-009-1070-5.
Rancé F, Juchet a, Brémont F, Dutau G. Correlations between skin prick tests using commercial extracts and fresh foods, specific IgE, and food challenges. Allergy. 1997;52:1031-1035. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb02427.x.
Galindo-Pacheco LV, O’Farrill-Romanillos PM, Amaya-Mejía AS, Almeraya-García P, López-Rocha E. Anafilaxia secundaria a pruebas cutańeas prick-to-prick para alimentos y sus factores de riesgo. Rev Alerg Mex. 2014;61(1):24-31. Disponible en: http://revistaalergia.mx/ojs/index.php/ram/article/view/18
Bagg A, Chacko T, Lockey R. Reactions to prick and intradermal skin tests. Ann Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2009;102(5):400-402. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60511-X.
Breiteneder H, Ebner C. Molecular and biochemical classification of plant-derived food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106(1 Pt 1):27-36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mai.2000.106929.
Scala E, Till SJ, Asero R, Abeni D, Guerra EC, Pirrotta L, et al. Lipid transfer protein sensitization: Reactivity profiles and clinical risk assessment in an Italian cohort. Allergy Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;70(8):933-943. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/all.12635.
López-Torrejón G, Crespo JF, Sánchez-Monge R, Sánchez-Jiménez M, Alvarez J, Rodriguez J, Salcedo G. Allergenic reactivity of the melon profilin Cuc m 2 and its identification as major allergen. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35(8):1065-1072. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02303.x.
Nucera E, Mezzacappa S, Aruanno A, Pecora V, Rizzi A, Ricci AG, et al. Hypersensitivity to major panallergens in a population of 120 patients. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2015;32(4):255-261. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pdia.2015.53321.
Fah J, Wuthrich B, Vieths S. Anaphylactic reaction to lychee fruit: Evidence for sensitization to profilin. Clin Exp Allergy. 1995;25(10):1018-1023. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1995.tb00405.x.
Lorenz AR, Scheurer S, Vieths S. Food allergens: Molecular and immunological aspects, allergen databases and cross-reactivity. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2015;101:18-29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000371647

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Alergia México